Kashmir-Hong Kong: The furious flames of separatism – Owei Lakemfa


Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

By Owei Lakemfa

This week has been one of the most dramatic in Kashmir, India, and certainly in Hong Kong where protests and a general strike locked down the city resulting in  train disruptions and cancellation of over 100 flights. Also, the protesters carried  the fight to police stations and barracks.

Hong Kong, compared to Kashmir,  is a far  less complicated  case given the fact that it is an internal fight  within  Greater China. The demands and stated aims of the protesters continue to evolve from what was supposed to be a protest against an extradition  bill that would have authorized the movement of persons for trial in mainland  China. When the government backed down over the bill, the protesters went after the Hong Kong chief executive, Carrie Lam, demanding her resignation. Now, they are  calling more or less for secession under the slogans: “Free Hong Kong” and “Restore Hong Kong. The revolution of our time”

There are  two contending ideologies at the heart of the struggles; Hong Kong elements who do not want to be weaned from their capitalist birth and neo-colonial notion of democracy, and  a socialist mainland which while desirous in maintaining the ‘One Country Two Systems”  agreement, wants to retain its  grip on Hong Kong.

 Following  a war in 1842,  the British colonialists took part of Hong Kong, and got  what was called the New Territories, ceded to it for 99 years . In 1984, the British  reached an agreement for  a peaceful handover  of the territory to China in 1997. There was a proviso that  until 2047, Hong Kong would  have  “a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defence affairs”

Given the presence of pro-China persons amongst the populace and the political class, the protesters are uncomfortable with the growing influence and powers of China in the territory. They are uncomfortable about what  will happen twenty eight years from now when the special powers given to the territory would end. So they want to assert complete autonomy before then.

Former colonial master, Britain is as expected, supporting the protest movement. Its Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt  told the media: “The UK signed an internationally binding legal agreement in 1984 that enshrines the one country two systems rule, enshrines the basic freedoms of the people of Hong Kong and we stand four square behind that agreement, four square behind the people of Hong Kong…There will be serious consequences if that internationally binding legal agreement were not to be honoured.”

However,  the Chinese do not seem perturbed by such declarations.  A spokesman for the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council, Yang Guang said: “We would like to make it clear to the very small group of unscrupulous and violent criminals and the dirty forces behind them: Those who play with fire will perish by it.” He added” Don’t ever misjudge the situation and mistake our restraint for weakness … Don’t ever underestimate the firm resolve and immense strength of the central government.”

In expressing the Chinese government’s confidence in the leadership of Carrie Lam, he said: “We are confident that with the full support of the central government and the mainland … our Hong Kong compatriots will be able to govern, develop and manage Hong Kong well, and Hong Kong will overcome the difficulties and challenges going forward.”

The on-going battles in Hong Kong are mainly mass protests, hurling bricks and  bottles, throwing eggs and disrupting the flow of governance while the  government’s responses are threats, use of teargas, water cannon, pepper spray and arrest of  148 protesters.

Ivy League 300 x 250 (2)

On the other hand, Kashmir is a far more complicated and violent case. First, it is international; a quite passionate disagreement between India and Pakistan, the first  two nuclear powers in history to have engaged in direct bombing of each other’s territory. Secondly, it involves international terrorism including Al Qaeda. Thirdly, it has religious undertones; a passionate and unbending strand of Hinduism and an infectious and a fanatical element  of Islam.

This week, India locked down Kashmir, cut off the internet and took  the unprecedented and potentially explosive step  of  revoking Article 370, a constitutional provision that  empowered Kashmir  to make its own laws  except finance, defence, foreign affairs and communications.

The Kashmir Question is a colonial creation. The British colonialists had coupled together a huge colony, British India. This  ‘Mother India’ gave  birth to nine countries; Malaysia, Sri Lanka,  Nepal, Afghanistan, Singapore, British Somalia, Myanmar (formerly Burma) Pakistan and Bangladesh.

However, the most painful birth was Pakistan (which then included Bangladesh). The colonialists sent Sir Cyril Radcliffe as chairman of the India Boundary Commission to slice off a new country, Pakistan from India. Radcliffe  who had never been to the country before, carried out  the separation within seven weeks by simply drawing a line in the colony calling one part India and the other Pakistan.

 Kashmir was on the rough edges of the so called ‘Radcliff Line’  The territory was given the option to choose between  the two new countries. The thought might have been that the Kashmiris would go for Pakistan which was mainly a   Muslim territory just  like  Kashmir, but they choose India. That choice made 71 years ago,  has led to both countries going to war four times.

Former Pakistani Prime Minister, Nawaz  Sharif made peace gestures when in 2014, he visited India,  the first ever visit by a Pakistani leader. The following year, his Indian counterpart, Narendra  Modi, reciprocated. But the peace efforts collapsed.

Current Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan sought to revive the peace moves.  He said the crisis in Kashmir would be resolved not militarily, but through negotiations and sought to present it not as territorial claims, but  as a humanitarian issue. However, this Tuesday, Khan in reaction to the abolition of Kashmir’s semi-autonomous   seemed to have lost his cool: “I want to make it clear that we will fight this issue on every forum, (including) at the UN Security Council…If the world does not act today… (if) the developed world does not uphold its own laws, then things will go to a place that we will not be responsible for.”

The Pakistani Chief of Army Staff, General Qamar Javed Bajwa added :”Pakistan Army firmly stands by the Kashmiris in their just struggle to the very end. We are prepared and shall go to any extent to fulfil our obligations in this regard.”

I think Hong Kong will go fully Chinese and become wholly integrated with mainland China no matter the prevailing ideology in the latter, but Kashmir still has a long journey in the wilderness of sectarianism, secession and anarchism because the resolution of its crises, is dependent on the resolution of the 71-year old Indo-Pakistani conflict.

Get breaking news first

* indicates required

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

You might also like

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.